Design DeFi Insurance

Hard45 min
1 / 30
understanding9 min read

Problem Statement: On-Chain Mutual Insurance

Problem Statement: On-Chain Mutual Insurance — DeFi insurance interview depth

Problem Statement: On-Chain Mutual Insurance

Nexus Mutual pioneered discretionary mutual cover where members stake ETH into a pooled capital model and vote on claim payouts after smart-contract incidents. This section anchors problem statement: on-chain mutual insurance during the understanding phase of a Nexus/InsurAce-class design.

Mechanism

  • buyCover transfers premium to pool; activeCover increases until MCR blocks new sales.
  • Risk engine recomputes product weights hourly from exploit frequency and severity priors.
  • Claims attach IPFS evidence hashes; assessors stake reputation tokens and vote during a time-boxed window before escrow releases payout.

Solvency invariants

On-chain activeCover + claimReserves ≤ bondedCapital × MCRfactor is evaluated atomically on every buyCover. Off-chain dashboards may lag one block but purchase simulation must mirror contract revert reasons.

Failure modes

  • oracle spike triggering false parametric payout on thin stablecoin pool
  • liquidity crunch when stakers rush to withdraw after large approved claim

Interview checkpoint (sec-01)

State 72h assessment window and 67% quorum for discretionary payouts.

Staff+ talking point

Contrast discretionary vs parametric honestly — hybrid products need two audit surfaces.

javaOne Dark Pro
1public final class McrGuard {
2 public boolean canSellCover(long activeCover, long capital, int mcrPct) {
3 return activeCover * 100L <= capital * mcrPct;
4 }
5}
pythonOne Dark Pro
1ACTIVE_COVER_USD = 800_000_000
2BONDED_CAPITAL_USD = 1_120_000_000
3MCR_RATIO = BONDED_CAPITAL_USD / ACTIVE_COVER_USD
typescriptOne Dark Pro
1export interface CoverQuote {
2 productId: string;
3 coverAmount: bigint;
4 durationDays: number;
5 premiumWei: bigint;
6}

Why interviewers care

DeFi Insurance interviews reward crisp scope, explicit trade-offs, and failure stories—not generic microservice diagrams.

Interview checkpoint

Name one failure story for Problem Statement: On-Chain Mutual Insurance that proves you understand real outages, not happy-path diagrams.

Key Highlights

  • Cover capacity is bounded by **Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)** — active cover amount m
  • Off-chain services index `CoverPurchased`, `ClaimSubmitted`, `ClaimVoted` events into Post
  • 72h assessment with 67% quorum
Mention this
Tie Problem Statement: On-Chain Mutual Insurance to **MCR headroom** and **assessment quorum** — signals mutual insurance literacy.
Pro tip
Simulate buyCover with eth_call before UX shows purchasable limits; never trust off-chain MCR after volatility.

Section Rescue Kit

Buzzwords to use:

MCRDiscretionary assessment

Safe statements:

  • "For Problem Statement: On-Chain Mutual Insurance, I'll define solvency invariants before cloud SKUs."
  • "I'll narrate exploit → pause cover → claim → vote → timelocked payout when stuck."
Design DeFi Insurance - System Design | WinJob | WinJob